"The ocean is vast, deep and dangerous with her mysteries hidden under her raiment of waves. Death like the ocean hides her secrets, and we who stand on the shore, catch only an occasional glimpse."
Showing posts with label apparition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label apparition. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 20, 2019
Saturday, March 17, 2018
Lilburn Manor; Another Chapter in a Haunted Past
Author of Anatomy of a Ghost: A Guide to Analyzing the Dead
"But it was five years later that I just started having this gnawing feeling that I just had to get there.”
Overlooking
historic Ellicott City, Maryland is the stately Lilburn Mansion. Already notorious for its haunts, the aging
mansion built in the likeness of a castle has a tragic past of loss and
sadness. Enter a young, impressionable
woman with a love of history and you have a recipe for a ghostly obsession that
lasted years.
In
my collection of interviews I came across a case where a person became an
unwitting mouth piece for an entity. This
case doesn’t appear to be a case of the more sinister form of possession, but a
case of spiritual obsession. Obsession
by a spirit is somewhat different from possession. In this case a living person
can become obsessed, or fixated on an idea or behavior that is obviously out of
character and sometimes self-destructive. They can be urged to do compulsive
acts, but they don’t lose sight of themselves. In other words they may feel the
need to do something, but they don’t black out or lose control. They realize
what they’re doing, and understand that the compulsion comes from without and
not within themselves. In Judy’s case
she remained aware of what she was doing, and understood that the compulsions
she was experiencing were not of her own choosing.
Now
retired and living near the beach in Maryland, Judy had been a hardworking
career woman all her life. She ran a restaurant and a catering service for many
years before giving up the long days and nights in the kitchen for
semi-retirement as a book keeper. She recounted for me an episode in her life
in which she seemed to be obsessed by the tragic spirit of a woman and the
stately remains of an edifice of tragedy.
In
an interview I conducted with her, Judy recounted how it began. “I was between
eighteen and twenty-five at the time when this happened, and it was really what
started my interest in the paranormal. But you know you grow up, you raise
kids, you have a job and you just don’t have the time to pursue it. I know this
is going to sound weird, maybe not to you because you deal with this, but it
certainly sounded weird to all my friends at the time. I used to live in
Clarksville at my brother’s. I used to love to walk in Ellicott City. There
used to be a place called the Phoenix which was right on the corner of
Cranberry Avenue and Market Street. My girlfriends and I used to go down there
and have lunch all the time. One day we just decided to go riding around and seeing
what the houses were like. So we drove up there and that’s when it started.
This house looked like a Castle, it was up on Cranberry Avenue, up where the
railroad used to be. You’d have to go up a hill to get there.”
“We
were up there and I thought, wow, what a cool house. At the time it wasn’t
inhabited but there were no trespassing signs everywhere. And we thought, we
can’t go in here. So we took a couple of pictures of the outside of the house
which is really cool. Around six months later we saw an ad in the paper that
the house was for sale. They were asking a million –three at that time and that
was 1980 to 1982 maybe. I certainly didn’t
have that. Not too long after that it sold to a person, I don’t remember who
but I have it on my timeline. Then after that it sold to the doctor who owned
it for a long time. So we took a couple pictures of it, as I said, and then we
drove back down to Ellicott City, and I said I want to go back to the Phoenix
and ask about that house.”
And
I did, and they said, 'Ooh. That’s the haunted house in Ellicott City. So I
asked, ‘well what happened up there?’ They said, ‘oh, well there’s someone up
in the tower. There was a fire there and children had died, and it’s had many
owners. But everyone stays away from that house because it’s supposedly
haunted.’”
So
captivated by the house did Judy become, that over the course of the next
couple of years she would research the property extensively. The following are
from the notes that she made and kept all these years later.
The
building is not a house in actuality, but a mansion of some 7000 square feet.
Built in the 9th century Gothic and Romanesque Revival style with
stone and granite, it boasts twenty rooms, a four story medieval style tower,
twelve foot ceilings and seven fireplaces with marble mantels and surrounds.
The property also boasts a three-story carriage house and the only three-story
smoke house ever built in Howard County.
It
was built in 1857 by Henry Richard Hazelhurst. Originally from Abington,
Berkshire England, who moved to Ellicott City after making a fortune in iron
works. Henry had lost his first wife in 1848, but remarried a second time to
Elizabeth Virginia McKim. The family moved to the area around 1857 with their
two children, Maria and George. Soon after the mansion was finished a third
child, Catherine, was born. Soon after Catherine’s birth, however, tragedy
struck the family. Maria, aged three years, died of a childhood illness.
Throughout the course of the next five years Elizabeth delivered three more
daughters, Margaret, Julia and Elizabeth.
During
the Civil War the Hazelhurst’s allowed the mansion to be used as a hospital for
wounded soldiers. Following the war, the family’s financial interests may have
taken a down-turn, as Henry apparently was forced to sell off several acres of
land surrounding the mansion, which was distressing to the family. The original
plot of land was 2500 acres, eventually it was whittled down to eight.
Elizabeth
reportedly suffered bouts of depression for twenty some years. Judy’s notes
suggested that the depression was brought on by the loss of daughter Maria. The
loss of a child is a tragedy beyond words, even in an era when such losses were
common. The birth of later children apparently did nothing to assuage the loss.
Elizabeth passed away in 1887. She was fifty-nine years old when she died of an
unspecified illness.
Her
daughters would be even less fortunate. Indeed, none of Elizabeth’s daughters
would live to reach the age of forty.
Catherine
the third child, and the first to be born in the mansion, was reportedly very
close to her mother. She died only four years after her mother’s death. She was
thirty-three when she passed in 1891.
Only
two years into her marriage, Julia died in childbirth in 1893, at the age of
thirty-one. She was laboring in the tower of the mansion trying to deliver her
first and only child when she died.
Not
much is known about Margaret, only that she died in 1895 at the age of
thirty-six. Henry, who was losing his family one by one is quoted as saying
that the mansion was “A place of tragic memories.” Still Henry lived to old
age. Accounts vary, but he either died in 1890 or 1900, either at the age of
seventy-five or eighty five. He was laid to rest at St John’s Cemetery of
Howard County next to wife Elizabeth. The last and final daughter, Elizabeth,
followed her father to the grave five years later in 1905.
The
first born, and only surviving child, George sold the mansion in 1906. He moved
to Catonsville, Maryland and died in 1919.
A
waspish man by the name of Wells bought the mansion next, and inhabited the
mansion with his family into the early 1920’s. Apparently a bit of a character,
Wells earned a reputation with the town’s folk for his petulant demeanor. He
was known to snap at anyone that attempted to speak with him. One who valued
his privacy, Wells had a seven foot hedge planted around the front of the
property. The Wells family stayed mainly in the house, emerging only on Sunday
mornings to attend church. Wells was found dead one day in the mansion’s
library.
John
McGinnis and family were in residence in the mansion by 1923, when a
devastating fire destroyed much of the interior. The family managed to escape
the blaze, but were forced to rebuild. During the renovation they added the
medieval style battlements to the roof of the tower, replacing the steeple
gothic roof that had been the original design.
Apparently
the mansion earned its haunted reputation with the town around that time.
According to Judy’s research, activity in the mansion included the sounds of a
small child crying in an upstairs bedroom, and an apparition of a young girl
wearing a chiffon dress who was reported as playing in several rooms of the
mansion. There were also reports of an apparition of a man and a small child
walking hand-in-hand down the hallway. A male apparition was also reported
standing in a doorway. The aroma of cigar smoke, a habit not uncommon in
Hazelhurst’s era, was smelled and sometimes witnessed in the library, a curling
cloud of smoke wafting toward the ceiling in an otherwise empty room. The
chandelier in the dining room was said to swing with vigor at times, once
during a family gathering. Footsteps, sometimes heavy footsteps, were at times
heard around the building, and on the tower stairs. And once, a vase full of
flowers was said to elevate off its stand, pouring water and flowers out onto
the floor.
Windows
in the manse appeared to be uncooperative, refusing to stay closed. This was
especially true in the tower. One owner attempted to tie the errant windows
down with rope. By the time he got outside to inspect his handiwork, however,
the windows of the tower were open again, the ropes lying on the floor beneath.
Judy
commenced her story, upon learning that the mansion was up for sale. “Right
then I thought I want to buy that house. But I couldn’t.” The one-million dollar asking price was
inconceivable to a woman who waited tables.
Her dream mansion was such that, she had to concede, just a dream.
“And
then years later, I think it was five years later when I lived with my brother,
that’s when that started happening to me. I had taken other friends around and
we would look at it and just ride around the streets. But it was five years
later that I just started having this gnawing feeling that I just had to get
there.”
“I
thought at the time, this is weird, but I’ve got to go [to the house]. And I
would go, and I would sit and I would bawl my eyes out.” She admitted that she
had no idea why she was crying, but that she was simply overwhelmed with,
“complete sadness.”
In
her research she had found accounts of tragedies, any one of which she might be
tapping into. The house had burned down. A lady that had lived in the house had
lost three children. Owners of the property had come and gone with great regularity.
For all its grandeur it hadn’t been a house of joy for its inhabitants.
“I’ve
got loads of stuff, I went to Ellicott City, the historical society and I
gathered so much information. I always wanted to explore this home. Years ago
in the early 2000’s a couple were trying to make the house into a bed and
breakfast, but Ellicott City wouldn’t allow them to do that. But it’s still,
it’s lived in, but there are many, many stories about it.”
“For
some reason I connected with a woman in the house, who was very, very sad. I
could be at my brother’s and it could be any time. Every two or three months,
it could be three o’clock in the morning or it could be noon. If I was asleep I
would wake up and I’d have this insatiable desire, I had to get to the house.
I’m surprised no one ever called the cops on me. Because I’d go and I’d sit
outside the house in my little car and I’d bawl my eyes out for an hour. And then it was done, and I went
home. But it was reoccurring and it would happen every two or three months with
regularity for three years, and then it absolutely stopped.” Judy admitted that
she probably repeated the ritual a dozen times over the three year period while
she shared a grief so terrible with an unknown woman that it communicated
beyond the veil.
“I
did, I thought I was cracking up, but the feeling was just so strong in me, and
I went, and I would have this experience and I would go home, and then I was so
relieved. And then it wouldn’t happen again until a couple of months later. It
was weird, but it was cool. So I decided that I needed to find out more about
this house, and the owners, and the timeline. The stack of papers [she
accumulated] is probably this thick [around two inches] and I wrote down a
timeline of when the fire was, who owned it, who built it, how many acres it
was. That was so interesting for me to go and do that kind of research.”
“So
that was why I did so much research on the home. I don’t even recall now the
name of the woman that lost the three children, but I always felt a connection
that maybe she was the one that did that. I don’t know.”
“I
knocked on the door one day, there was a doctor living there, a lady, and I
kind of introduced myself and I told her my story and I asked her if I could
come in. But she didn’t know me, and I don’t blame her for saying no. It was
just so fascinating.”
“My
brother thought I was crazy, my friends thought I was crazy. So I really didn’t
[share it with anyone] because it was personal to me. It felt very personal
that someone was reaching out to do that. I just went with it. When it stopped,
I was kind of sad that it stopped. I realized it had been six months or so and
I realized, wow, I haven’t been to that house in a long time. And it never
happened again.”
What is fascinating to me about this
account is the fact that Judy never actually entered the dwelling, and had no
knowledge of its history at the onset. She apparently made an immediate
connection to the property, though, obvious by the fact that she took pictures
of it on the first encounter and went downtown to inquire about it immediately.
Final Analysis
Why
was she the one of the whole band of friends that was affected in this way? Can
we assume that she was the only one with the empathic ability to tap into the
tragic energy? I wonder also if the energy, the sadness she apparently was in
tune with, was actually a consciousness or just a type of residual sadness that
lingered about the property.
The
episodes Judy underwent certainly didn’t seem to have had any purpose beyond
the sheer expression of pain. This energy appeared to require nothing but
expression. The expression of sadness, expiation, all those years after. The
death of a child, three children, a woman in childbirth…Judy would go on to
become a mother herself. Did the spirit
sense a bond? Was it Elizabeth still mourning the loss of Maria? Was it one of
the later residents who also experienced tragedy in the mansion? We will never
know, beyond the fact that death and loss left an imprint on a place that
transcended the passage of time.
Saturday, December 24, 2016
Where the Imaginary Ends and the Dark Begins; Children and their Unseen Friends
By Robin M. Strom Mackey
If you’ve ever been around a
small child you’ll probably recall that they chatter all the time. They chatter to their toys, they chatter to
their parents, they make strange noises over and over and over again. It’s necessary to language development of
course, though it may drive you crazy after awhile! But when and if they start chattering to a
friend that only they can see, a parent may start to become uncomfortable.
There are some theories to
suggest that children are more open to paranormal experiences than their often more
cynical parents. Some believe that children
may be more telepathically astute. The mere fact that they haven’t been told that
there is no such thing as telepathy might make them more open to the
experiencing of it.
They may also be more telepathically attune because of their dependence on their parents. The mere survival of a youngster is contingent on the adult caregiver, and thus a telepathic bond with a parent evolves, which may dissipate as the child develops skills and becomes more independent.
It is believed that telepathy is stronger in the
young, dimming with age. This has been
suggested in the study of psychokinesis or poltergeists cases, where the human
conduit is usually an adolescent or young adult, an age when the mix of
swirling hormones and adolescent angst help spur their already innate abilities.
Along those same lines of thinking, does being telepathically more attune also
make children more susceptible to spirit communication? The fact that many children have wonderfully
active imaginations creates another problem. As a parent one begins to wonder,
where does the imaginary end and the dark begin?
In an email recently I received
an inquiry that intrigued me. Lindsey
wrote:
I
have resided in my home for a little over a year now. I have a two-year old
[daughter] and a one-year old [son].
Since we have moved here my daughter has acted a little off. Since she
has grown older she is now carrying on conversations with something only she
can see….
Two
weeks ago it [my emphasis] gained a
name - Jesse. No one we know or interact with has this name. One of my brothers
is named Jesse, but he does not even live in Delaware, and she has never had a
relationship with him.” His name rarely comes up, so it’s odd that she just
randomly started saying that name.
“I
have asked her who Jesse is and where he/she is, and within seconds of me
acknowledging its [my emphasis] name
my dog started growling at something, which has never happened before. My dog
does not have a mean bone in her body.”
She growls only at strangers, and usually only at male strangers.
My son
who is one has now started pointing at things that I believe they see, and I do
not. Toys will go off; singing in their bedroom when no one is in there. It
doesn't seem to be anything violent, but it is becoming more frequent.
And
as any mother would be I am getting a little worried about the intentions of
whatever this spirit may want. I'm just wondering if you have any advice as to
how I can maybe make a connection of this name with someone who may have lived
here in the past or what steps I could take to do so. The property has been in
my family as a rental house for a long time. However my grandmother does not believe in the
paranormal.” She is not open to listening to me or helping in any way (used
with permission).
My first question was, would a child
of two be too young to have developed an imaginary friend? Consulting child development experts suggests
that it was young, but not impossible. According to one source, typically
children develop such friends from three to eight years of age. Yet another
source suggested that children are becoming conscious beings, alert to their
own identity, from the time that they can recognize themselves in a mirror. Further, from the first time onward that a
child makes a Choo Choo noise while playing with a toy train, or holds a doll
and babbles out dialogue it can be assumed that the child has now developed the
ability at abstract play (Turgeon, 2009).
Without any further background
knowledge or an investigation into the property I wrote Lindsey back suggesting
she could consider the situation in two ways, believer or skeptic:
1.
Skeptic: From a skeptic's point
of view we might assume that your daughter has an active imagination and has
created a friend for herself. We may have only heard you mention your
brother Jessie in a telephone call. Or maybe she heard the name on a TV
program. Perhaps she seized onto the name because she liked it. I
remember doing the same when I was a little girl. I had the names of my
sons picked out by the time I was five. Maybe she's created her
make-believe friend because she's lonely? In which case maybe some play
dates with other kids could be tried, something that would let her socialize
with kids her own age more and creating fictional friends less.
My son when he was younger had a
lot of electronic toys. I found they would often start by themselves in
his closet, especially when the batteries were low. Try replacing batteries, or
taking them out entirely if the toy is not used often.
2.
Believer: From the standpoint that you might have an entity trying to
speak with her. Again I would suggest that the same thing. Try to get her
out of her room more and playing with other kids
I wouldn't forbid her talking
about her friend Jessie, but I wouldn't actively encourage the behavior either.
In other words, don’t greet her every morning with the words, “what did the
ghost say to you last night?” I’ve seen parents do this to children, thereby
encouraging their children in the belief that there is a ghost and only they
can communicate with it. Or worse yet,
in the case of children who are easily frightened, scaring the children by
making them believe that there actually
is a ghost in the house, and it’s trying to communicate with them despite
the fact that they want nothing to do with it.
But I also wouldn't take the hard-core
stance that there's “no such thing as ghosts”. This suggests that whatever the
child might have experienced is all in their imagination, and worst case
scenario might suggest to the child that they may be punished or rebuked for
admitting so. It also effectively shuts down the lines of communication. I’ve read accounts by adults who experienced
truly frightening phenomena in their houses as children. When they tried to tell their parents they
were shunned. In some cases these same
children had to endure often terrifying activity in silence. It’s terrible to imagine a child being
victimized in this manner, and even worse to imagine them doing so in isolation.
In-home
Investigation
On the market now are all types
of nifty surveillance cameras and equipment. Many standalone cameras can
connect to a smart phone. I would definitely get one that also has
audio. I would suggest that you set one up in her room so that you could
see and hear what's going on for yourself. That would hopefully give you some
piece of mind.
Motion sensor night lights in
hallways and public spaces might also help you feel a bit more secure. They are
available in both plug-in or battery operated. I've placed them all over my
house.
To find out more about a property
and its history I would start at a local library or historical society -
if you have one in the area. Don't be surprised if you find no mention of a
Jessie, however. I think that's simply the name your daughter gave her
friend. These things rarely work out that neatly.
Paranormal
Hypochondria
A parapsychologist acquaintance
admits that with all the attention the paranormal has gotten in the media of
late that many of us now have developed what he calls paranormal
hypochondria. In every odd situation we
now experience we are programmed to read in paranormal. Lost a loved one, the need becomes even
greater. I once had a conversation with
a woman who wanted me to perform an investigation for her. The conversation started with I lost Dad in
200X and my brother in 200X. She continued, I saw an orb on my surveillance
camera and my toddler walked up the stairs and held his arms up asking
something that I couldn’t see to pick him up and carry him up the stairs. (First of all, don’t get me started on orbs!)
All in all, I told her this was pretty slim pickings in the way of evidence.
The
Third Route
Instead of actively encouraging
or discouraging, I would try the third route.
If the child wants to discuss what they experienced try to calmly and
openly listen to her. Listen attentively
when she talks to you about her new friend, but don’t bring the subject up with
her yourself. That's just giving her the green light that any such
imaginings are just fine with you. Young children are very in tune with
their parent's opinions and will take their cue from your attitude as to how to
feel about the situation. You want to be open to listening and remain calm. Ask
questions and try to make no formal pronouncements.
Lyndsey’s
Experiment
A client of mine, also named
Lyndsey, came up with her own solution to a sticky problem. Lyndsey’s home is
quite active. Our team has actually
investigated the site three times with another investigation tentatively
scheduled for next summer. Every time we
investigate Lyndsey’s house we come away with multiple EVP’s, most often by a
speaker who seems to be a woman. This
corresponds with what Lyndsey has told us.
She has confided that she often feels a matronly personality in the
home, one that appears to be attached in particular with their very young
son. They have a baby monitor in the
child’s room and they often hear the little boy communicating with someone or
something that they cannot see. And they often detect strange sounds through
the monitor. The activity had always been harmonious. However, right after our third investigation
in early November I got a disturbing email from Lyndsey.
She said that the activity in the
boy’s room had taken a turn for the worse.
He had awoken one night screaming that he had seen a ghost, and
demanding to be let out of the room. For
long nights afterward he insisted on sleeping with them in the master bedroom
and refused to enter his own room even during the day. What was she to do? I gave her the same advice that I’ve written
about in this article, suggesting she find some way to speak with the boy
calmly so as not to scare the absolute bejesus out of the tyke. What she did next I thought was brilliant. She made it into a game.
Using one of the pool soakers –
the kind that have the noodle bodies and suck up the water only to shoot it out
in a long stream – she told her son that they were going to play
ghostbusters. Walking through the house
he was to tell her where he had seen ghosts and she would suck them up. He dutifully showed her where he had seen
entities and she sucked them up and took care of them. Incidentally, the boy indicated the same
spots that we had determined to be active in our investigations.
This activity did a number of
things worth noting. First, it pointed
out to a concerned mother where her son was seeing apparitions. The fact that it appeared to correspond with
her experiences and with investigation results is validating. Second, she took her son seriously neither
encouraging him to make things up nor discouraging him from communicating with
her. But third, and I think this is the most important, is that it gave mother
and son the power back. I’m sure they both felt like they were much more in
control after the activity.
Fourth, although some experts in
the paranormal community disagree with me, I think Lyndsey’s exercise was a
good way to communicate with the spirit.
I have always felt that if a spirit is in some way an essence of a
deceased human, than they are bound by the same upbringing and courtesies with
which we were raised. In other words, you
can communicate and attempt to set parameters with an unseen house guest. I think Lyndsey’s game also went a long way
toward doing that, indicating to the spirit that she had been seen, that she
had overstepped the boundaries by frightening the boy and that such behavior
was not acceptable.
It wasn’t immediate, but Lyndsey
eventually got the little tyke sleeping in his own room again, and as far as I
know, peacefully.
Final
Thoughts – Imaginary Friend or Other
Obviously without a lengthy
interview and investigation I can’t say, or even speculate, as to whether
Lindsey’s daughter is simply a very precocious and imaginative two-year old, or
whether something is truly communicating with the child. As I said earlier, it has been theorized
that very young children are more open to telepathic communication with the
spirit world. They may see spirits because they don't know they shouldn't be
able to. The ability decreases with age
This is also an age when children
are developing the ability of imaginative play.
And this is not something to be discouraged. The same child development sources suggested
that imaginative play has some very positive outcomes. Recent studies have
indicated that children who developed imaginary friends weren’t, as had been
speculated, lonely and isolated children, but highly creative. Those that developed these “friends” were
both more creative and socially adept than other children. In language studies
such children were found to use complex sentence structures and developed
advanced vocabularies. Overall, they were more socially adept at getting along
with their classmates. The explanation seems to be that children with a
developed imaginary friend got a chance at role playing both sides of a
conversation. They developed better abstract thinking skills and were better at
creating original ideas. The recently released book, Nurture Shock even cites research that seems to indicate that
children who spent extended time in abstract play often demonstrated leaps in
school achievement (Turgeon, 2009).
Resources
Turgeon,
Heather (2009). Imaginary Friends. Babble.com (A subsidiary of Disney Inc.)
Retrieved November, 27, 2016 from https://www.babble.com/toddler/imaginary-friends-early-child-development-imagination/
Monday, July 14, 2014
Musings of a Paranormal Investigator
![]() |
The author on an investigation. Notice the mist in the right side of photo. It wasn't present in the picture before, nor in the picture after. |
"What is it like to be a
paranormal investigator? Well, honestly, it's a lot like fishing."
A
few years ago I took up a new hobby. As a middle aged woman with a career and a
child at home you might expect me to take up golf, as my husband did. After
all, it’s easy on the joints and it would allow me to enjoy well-manicured
nature while sporting cute outfits and coordinating clubs. But I went a
different route, I became a paranormal investigator
Say
you’re a ghost hunter to the uninitiated and images of proton packs and near
fatal slimmings come to mind. You probably envision Dan Akroyd and Bill Murray
playing high-tech ghost busting conquistadors. That unfortunately is not the
reality of paranormal investigating. I’ve not been issued a proton pack to
date, and no ghost, according to my research, has ever slimed anyone.
So what is ghost hunting like, you ask? I have to admit, I’ve found ghost hunting to be more like…fishing. Just like fishing, when you’ve got a ghost “on the line,” it is an adrenaline rush like little I’ve ever experienced before. But most of the time, and I mean most of the time, you’re merely casting into the dark. Back home we used to fish for muskies, (short for Muskellunge) an elusive fish that fights like the dickens when hooked. The fisherman’s motto is that a fisherman has to cast 100,000 times before catching one of these beasties. It’s no wonder that one lucky enough to catch a Muskie usually has it stuffed and mounted versus eating it for dinner.
So
how often do ghost hunters experience something honestly paranormal? Opinions
vary, but somewhere between 1 in 5 investigations to 1 in 20 investigations. In
other words you’ll spend somewhere between five or twenty sleepless nights
wandering around in spider-ridden old basements and sneezing in dusty, hot
attics before you actually capture anything even considered as sound evidence. Granted,
what is considered verifiable evidence depends enormously on the investigation
group and how rigorous they are with what they collect.
When
I say rigorous I’m talking about the degree to which a group or individual is
willing to examine the evidence for verification, discarding any occurrences
that can be reasonably explained by natural occurrences. Obviously there is a
desire to advance the field of study by those in the paranormal field. The study of the paranormal has always been
resoundingly snubbed by the scientific community. Paranormal activity is, after
all, unverifiable using scientific methods of study. You can’t, for example,
grow a spirit in a test tube and then grow another 1000 just like it. That is
not to say that organizations such as the Society for Psychical Research, which
was founded by in Great Britain in 1882 by some of the greatest scientific
minds of its day, haven’t made advances in paranormal studies. However, the
scientific community remains a conservative and skeptical group. Hence, much in
the paranormal world has fallen to normal people to investigate, and regular
folks aren’t trained in scientific study methods by and large; so evidential
review can be somewhat ragged.
Some few groups are extremely careful in their data collection, throwing out the vast majority of the evidence they collect in the name of scientific rigor. Technology advancements are helping to make evidence collection extremely precise, at least for groups that have deep pockets and tech know-how. Some savvy teams have constructed systems that record environmental samples of many different data types simultaneously (in some cases several times a second). Such systems can sample temperature, electromagnetic field fluctuations, ion levels, radiation levels etc. streaming all the information real-time to a computer which records it. Then, when something potentially paranormal occurs, these different types of data can be compared, giving a synchronized second by second picture of what actually changed in the environment during the episode. The data can then be compared with any audio or video evidence, giving an investigator a much broader picture and hopefully a better idea of how to detect future potential phenomenon.
The Believers
Then
are the groups of ambitious amateurs, who blithely call every photo of a flying
bug or dust mote an orb, and post everything they catch proudly on the web. I recently took the brunt of an argument with
a woman who was convinced that every photographic anomaly was the face of a
spirit. She proudly pointed out faces
and beards and hair in every dust moat captured. I didn’t have the heart to
tell her that our brains automatically attempt to find patterns in illogical
situations. It has been dubbed (incorrectly)
by many in the paranormal community as matrixing, actually the correct terms
are apophenia or pareidolia.
The Fame Seekers
I interviewed a seasoned investigator once who told me that she felt that those who stayed in the field found it necessary to periodically examine and develop their individual goals. Those that didn’t develop over time, she said, ended up leaving the field quickly. Personally I have found her observation enlightened. My own journey has involved a lot of soul searching and many changed paths. Over time I’ve decided my priority is research and writing, exploring all the topics about which I want to know more and then sharing my findings with the community.
I got into the field because I wanted to
explore the possibility of life after death, and that still remains my greatest
driving force. I started in the field as
an undecided vote, and I’ve yet to find that one piece of unambiguous evidence
that has convinced me to climb off the fence of skepticism yet. That’s not to
say that I haven’t experienced some undeniably strange things. But that truly profound, absolutely
unambiguous piece of evidence…still fishing for that.
Paranormal Tourism – The Thrill Seeker’s Vacation
The
gross majority of people that approach me about becoming an investigator are of
the thrill-seeker type. They drop me a
cryptic email about doing some investigating but can’t ever seem to find the
time to meet, or are far too busy to actually show up for an investigation. That’s
just fine. If you really want to try your hand but don’t have the time for a
commitment there is now a whole genre of tourism pandering to the paranormal
enthusiast. Haunted hotels, haunted
cruise ships, haunted houses, haunted forts and battlefields, séances, EVP
sessions, lecture series…. It’s all out
there and you can experience it all for the price of admission. If after an event or two you find you have an
insatiable need for more there are organizations out there that have a constant
need for new blood.
And so I approach my anniversary of fives. Five years of investigating, 50 online articles published and approaching 50,000 views on the blog. I still have no proton pack, I have no personal television show, and I have no unequivocal evidence proving the existence of life after death. But I do have a sense of accomplishment...almost as good as the perfect round of golf.
Definitions
Apophenia is when our brain
perceives connections or patterns where there are none.
Pareidolia is when we assign significance to otherwise random
patterns, like seeing the Virgin Mary’s face on the side of a potato.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)