By Robin
M. Strom-Mackey
Included in Part III are the opinions of Brad
Steiger, Author, and Michael Persinger, Ph.D.in Neuroscience,
Laurentian University.
So what is the explanation for these odd events? There are as many answers to that question as there are people who have experiences. Compiled here are the opinions of many experts both within and without the field. These are the words of writers, thinkers, scientists, college professors and lifelong investigators. This is what they have to say about the possibility of ghosts.
No Justification Necessary
What They Are
Author
Cons
P ersinger
goes on to say that these geophysical anomalies occur at many supposedly
haunted locations, often intersecting with the brainwaves of those in the
area. He has tested this theory in his laboratory
with some success “Many of the kinds of patterns of fields that are generated
of haunted areas that we have found are very complicated, brief transient
fields of erratic forces. If these forces stimulate the brain you can have
feelings of a presence, sounds of footsteps or movements or voices, and of
course that ever-present feeling that there is something looking at you (Persinger,
1997).” He concludes that highly creative individuals are more sensitive to
these electrostatic forces, which causes them to report more haunting phenomena
(Hauntings, 1997).”
Michael
Persinger, Ph.D.
Neuroscientist, Laurentian University
Documentary Produced by The History Channel (1997) The Unexplained: Hauntings.
Conover, Rob. A former private
investigator turned paranormal Investigator http://robconover.net/default.aspx
Few questions are like to
elicit a stronger response than the question, “do you believe in ghosts?” The
naysayers will quickly and adamantly deny any such possibility and call you a
fool for asking. The non-commital’s will shrug and move on to another, more
comfortable topic. And the dabblers and the believers will expound for long
minutes recalling odd experiences they have had.
Truthfully, few topics are as
divisive as this one. Those who deny the possibility often do so from vehement religious
beliefs. And, make no mistake, science became the religion of the 20th
century, with its scriptures as dogmatically adhered to by its followers as any
religious zealot. Proponents of science
vehemently defend the notion of science being able to answer all questions with
a rationale answer. The world around us, they tell us, is the only reality, and anything unexplained simply a riddle not yet
solved.
On the other hand, those who
believe in the paranormal have a vested interest and will fight to support
their beliefs just as strongly. After
all, a belief in spirits is a belief that the soul survives death. And that is
a very attractive notion.
Whether you’re a believer,
fence sitter or fierce non-believer it is undeniable that people have been
seeing (and hearing, and smelling) ghosts since the dawn of mankind. Not every person among them is a fool,
charlatan or notoriety seeker. Indeed most people who experience something
paranormal are absolutely normal. Many are reluctant to even talk about their
experience, afraid of being ridiculed. The
paranormal knows no class bounds. Emperors and peasants, politicians, and garbage
collectors, a paranormal experience can happen (and has) to anyone. (See my series on famous people and the
paranormal to find out what the many of the greatest minds thought on the
subject.)
So what is the explanation for these odd events? There are as many answers to that question as there are people who have experiences. Compiled here are the opinions of many experts both within and without the field. These are the words of writers, thinkers, scientists, college professors and lifelong investigators. This is what they have to say about the possibility of ghosts.
Pros
No Justification Necessary
Brad Steiger,
author and co-author of some 150 books on the subject of the paranormal, says,
“After researching the paranormal for more than 50 years, I spend little time
these days theorizing about what ghosts may be. I accept the reality that
within each of us there is a spiritual essence that is imperishable and eternal.
I completely accept the existence of spirit phenomena, and I contend that it is
extremely multifaceted. While I believe it may be difficult to separate ghostly
manifestations into definitions of type and purpose that are truly distinct
from one another, I submit that real ghosts and restless spirits often fit into
the following categories: spirit residue, spirits of the dead, poltergeists,
spirit parasites and spirit masqueraders (Steiger, 2003).”
However,
Steiger presents a theory for ghostly activity that he borrows from his
colleague Brian A. Schill of the
American Society for Paranormal Research and investigation and author of the
book entitled The DNA of Ghosts. Schill attempts to explain the existence of
ghosts in scientific terms. The body,
Schill explains, has a “bioelectric cycle” functioning at 60 Hz. This cycle
allows our nervous system, brain, heart and organ to both function and
communicate with each other within the organism itself. If one
considers the first law of thermodynamics which states that energy cannot be
created nor destroyed, only transformed, “we are able to recognize that
two-thirds of our total existence is in the form of intangible energy (Steiger,
2003).” What then happens to this energy (which cannot be destroyed but only
transformed) when we die?
Schill
says that when we die the bioelectric energy is released out of the body into
the environment, where one of two things happens. This “unconscious energy” may disperse freely
into the environment and cause no manifestation thereafter. Or the energy may,
“through covalent bonding” attach itself to an object or building to which the
person was attached and remain in the environment. This covalent bonding can
occur anywhere, according to Schill, that has an “electron deficit” which
Steiger contends is the reason for repeat hauntings. This is likely to occur
when the energy is quickly released (as in an accidental or tragic death). The
energy “coagulates” within, “’the local environment over a short period of
time, maybe only a couple of minutes or so, and amass to such a degree that the
greater portion that was originally in the body has now become self-aware
outside of the body.’ Psychological forces of conscious will may also trigger
this type of reaction. When
self-awareness occurs, there is generally a degree of confusion because of the
new form that the person is in, one of pure energy rather than a physically
manifested body (Schill, Steiger, 2003).”
Steiger
suggests that there are three striking
similarities that paranormal investigators have documented over the years that
rather verify Schill’s theory. First, most haunting phenomena involve
low-level electromagnetic field disruptions, generally falling within 3 to 100 mill
gauss (Mg). The low-level disturbances
are caused, according to Steiger, by the “intangible bio-magnetic field that
makes up the ghost (Steiger, 2003).” He also contends that this bio-magnetic
field causes hiccups and malfunctioning of electric devices within the
environment.
A
second similarity is the occurrence
of “cold spots.” Steiger suggests that
air temperature drops somewhere between 10 and 40 degrees Fahrenheit during paranormal
activity. These drops are thought to be
due to the “unintentional attraction and condensation of free electrons in an
environment. The condensing of an energy
field leaves a momentary void of heat in the area (Steiger, 2003).”
And
the third similarity is that many ghostly
phenomena is caught using devices that measure in the infrared spectrum a lower level energy spectrum – which lies
just below the visible spectrum of energy and light which we can see with the
naked eye. This lower level of
electromagnetic energy seems to be the area of the spectrum, “where the
greatest number of manifestations take place (Steiger, 2003).” Because this lower spectrum borders the lower
portion of the visible spectrum where we see red, orange and yellow, he feels
that is might explain why entities are often caught only with our peripheral
vision versus our “direct line of sight.” “Manifestations seen with peripheral
vision also attract the attention of our unburdened subconscious rather than
our conscious mind, which bears the fears of social restriction and repression when
we experience something that is out of the ordinary (Steiger, 2003).”
Brad SteigerAuthor
Geophysical Forces
Neuroscientist,
Michael Persinger suggests a more
natural explanation for feelings associated with a haunting. He suggests
geophysical forces cause the feelings of a haunt. “’When you have geophysical
forces focused, even small ones, even tiny ones in the view of geophysical
forces, and you focus them into a small space for a brief time, you can get
tremendous magnetic fields generated. If that takes place you can get
fluorescent and light thresholds generated much like the will-o-the-wisp or
electro-static discharges. And if they
are above the illumino-static threshold you can photograph them just like any
other electrostatic phenomena.”
Neuroscientist, Laurentian University
Resources
Auerbach,
Loyd (2005) A Paranormal Casebook; Ghost Hunting in the New Millennium. Atriad
Press, LLC. Dallas, Texas.
Documentary Produced by The History Channel (1997) The Unexplained: Hauntings.
Steiger, Brad (2003) Real Ghosts, Restless Spirits and Haunted Places.
Visible Ink Press. Canton, MI.
Taylor, Troy (2007) Ghost
Hunter’s Guidebook: The Essential Guide to Investigating Ghosts &
Hauntings. American Ghost Society. White Chapel Press: Dark Haven
Entertainment. Decatur, Illinois.
No comments:
Post a Comment